Edmunds v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Edmunds v. State

76 So. 466, 16 Ala. App. 182, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 238

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 1917

Docket5 Div. 249.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 So. 466 (Edmunds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmunds v. State, 76 So. 466, 16 Ala. App. 182, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 238 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state. Numerous exceptions were reserved, pending the trial, to the ruling of the court upon the evidence, and to several portions of the court’s oral charge, and also to the giving and refusal of several special charges requested in writing. An exception was duly reserved to the oral charge of the court as follows:

“If you believe beyond a reasonable doubt the evidence as it has been offered, the court holds, would render the defendant guilty of that number of violations of the prohibition law.”

This was error, it being an invasion of the province of the jury, and was clearly a charge upon the effect of the testimony, in violation of section 5362 of the Code of 1907. See authorities collated as a footnote to that section.

For this error the judgment of the lower court will be reversed, and the cause remanded. In view of this holding, it is not deemed necessary to discuss other questions presented. ■

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI