Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi

D. Montana

Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi

DecidedJune 6, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-00108

StatusUnknown

This text of Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi (Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi, (D. Mont. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

CHARLES K. EDMUNDS, JR., CV 22-108-BLG-TJC

Plaintiff, ORDER vs. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

On March 28, 2023, the Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 13.) That same day, the Clerk of Court entered a separate judgment. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff has now filed an unopposed application for an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff requests an award of $9,679.94 in attorney’s fees and $402.00 in costs. Defendant does not object to the requested fees and costs. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $9,679.94 and costs of $402.00 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in this case, and will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. This award is subject to offset to satisfy any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and the Treasury Offset Program, 31 U.S.C. § 3716. Ifthe government determines Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of the award to be made directly to Plaintiff's counsel.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2023.

TIMOTHY JL'CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

CHARLES K. EDMUNDS, JR., CV 22-108-BLG-TJC

Plaintiff, ORDER vs. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

On March 28, 2023, the Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 13.) That same day, the Clerk of Court entered a separate judgment. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff has now filed an unopposed application for an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff requests an award of $9,679.94 in attorney’s fees and $402.00 in costs. Defendant does not object to the requested fees and costs. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $9,679.94 and costs of $402.00 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in this case, and will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. This award is subject to offset to satisfy any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and the Treasury Offset Program, 31 U.S.C. § 3716. Ifthe government determines Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of the award to be made directly to Plaintiff's counsel.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2023.

TIMOTHY JL'CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Edmunds Jr. v. Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmunds-jr-v-kijakazi-mtd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack