Edmund George Zagorski v. State of Tennessee
This text of Edmund George Zagorski v. State of Tennessee (Edmund George Zagorski v. State of Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION February 1, 1999 Filed: February 1, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk
EDMUND GEORGE ZAGORSKI, ) ) Appellant, ) ) ROBERTSON CIRCUIT V. ) ) No. 01SO1-9711-CC-00240 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee. )
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
Appellant Edmund George Zagorski has filed a petition to rehear this cause
pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 39 contending that our opinion conflicts with and/or
overlooks principles of law regarding trial counsel’s duties to investigate mitigation
evidence and fully advise a defendant regarding a potential mitigation defense. We
have reviewed all of the arguments raised in the petition, and we find them to be
without merit.
Accordingly, after due consideration, the court is of the opinion that the petition
should be and the same is hereby denied.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edmund George Zagorski v. State of Tennessee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmund-george-zagorski-v-state-of-tennessee-tenn-1999.