Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

190 A. 102, 117 N.J.L. 440, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 195

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 22, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 A. 102 (Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance, 190 A. 102, 117 N.J.L. 440, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 195 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

*441 Per Curiam.

Such of the grounds of appeal as exhibit claimed errors of law in the judgment under review are without substance. As to these, it suffices to say that Judge Oliphant properly construed the condition of the bond in suit. And there was evidence of a breach.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI