Edmondson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Edmondson v. State

1915 OK CR 245, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 602, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 25, 1915

DocketNo. A-2359.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 245 (Edmondson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmondson v. State, 1915 OK CR 245, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 602, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling one quart of whiskey to one,- Joe Sturgis, and on the 27th day of August, 1914, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50.00, and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. He-appealed from the judgment by filing in this court on November 4, 1914, a petition in error, with case-made. No brief has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Por this reason, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment. A cursory examination of the record indicates there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling one quart of whiskey to one,- Joe Sturgis, and on the 27th day of August, 1914, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50.00, and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. He-appealed from the judgment by filing in this court on November 4, 1914, a petition in error, with case-made. No brief has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Por this reason, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment. A cursory examination of the record indicates there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 245, 151 P. 1198, 12 Okla. Crim. 602, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmondson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.