Edmondson v. South Georgia Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Edmondson v. South Georgia Railway Co.

42 S.E. 68, 115 Ga. 790, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 592

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Coeb, J.

It not affirmatively appearing from the hill of exceptions that the same was served within ten days, and filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within fifteen days, after having been certified by the judge, and counsel for defendant in error having acknowledged service in these words only,111 acknowledge service of a true copy of the foregoing bill of exceptions, and further service thereof is waived,” the writ of error must be dismissed. Vickers v. Sanders, 106 Ga. 265.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coeb, J.

It not affirmatively appearing from the hill of exceptions that the same was served within ten days, and filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within fifteen days, after having been certified by the judge, and counsel for defendant in error having acknowledged service in these words only,111 acknowledge service of a true copy of the foregoing bill of exceptions, and further service thereof is waived,” the writ of error must be dismissed. Vickers v. Sanders, 106 Ga. 265.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent-

Edmondson v. South Georgia Railway Co., 42 S.E. 68, 115 Ga. 790, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 592 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

42 S.E. 68 (Edmondson v. South Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related