Edmondson v. Potter

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2002
Docket02-1339
StatusUnpublished

This text of Edmondson v. Potter (Edmondson v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmondson v. Potter, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1339

DELOIS EDMONDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACK POTTER, Postmaster General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-2887-S)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Delois Edmondson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Delois Edmondson appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her civil rights complaint without prejudice because she failed to

perfect service of process. Because Edmondson may refile this

action and perfect service of process, her appeal is interlocutory

and not subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v.

Sugar Workers Local 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edmondson v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmondson-v-potter-ca4-2002.