Edmondson v. Lovell

1 D.C. 103
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1802
StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 103 (Edmondson v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmondson v. Lovell, 1 D.C. 103 (D.D.C. 1802).

Opinion

Trespass quare clausum fregit. The Court decided that the execution of a deed of bargain and sale of land need not be proved, by subscribing witnesses if the deed has been duly ac[104]*104knowledged and recorded. And that possession alone was sufficient to maintain the action against one who has no title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmondson-v-lovell-dcd-1802.