Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners
177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63
This text of 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63 (Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edmondson v. Howard's Cleaners, 177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63 (Ohio 1964).
Opinion
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in charging on contributory negligence. Under the facts of this case, contributory negligence was a question of fact for determination by the jury.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Grass v. Ake, Exr., 154 Ohio St., 84. See, also, Horwitz v. Eurove, 129 Ohio St., 8.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grass v. Ake
93 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1950)
Horwitz v. Eurove
193 N.E. 644 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
177 Ohio St. (N.S.) 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmondson-v-howards-cleaners-ohio-1964.