Edmonds v. Grissom

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 8, 2001
• Docket: 01-1403
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1403

LUTHER C. EDMONDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant, and

ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED; SHERRY D. BATTLE,

Plaintiffs,

versus

E. PRESTON GRISSOM, individually and in his capacity of Judge, Judicial Circuit of Virgin- ia, Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake,

Defendant - Appellee, and

SCHRODER CHESAPEAKE, INCORPORATED, t/a Green- brier Mall,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-488-2)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther C. Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Luther C. Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to set aside a prior order. Our

review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488-2 (E.D. Va. Feb.

14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED