Edmonds v. Grissom

Fourth Circuit

Edmonds v. Grissom

11 F. App'x 310

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2001·No. No. 01-1403·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luther C. Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to set aside a prior order. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Luther C. Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to set aside a prior order. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Edmonds v. Grissom, 11 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 310 (Edmonds v. Grissom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.