Edmonds v. D2IQ Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK EDMONDS, Case No. 23-cv-02741-VC Plaintiff, y. ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 28 D2IQ INC., et al., Defendants.

Edmonds’s Motion for a Post-Merger Injunction is denied. He has not shown that he is entitled to relief under the Winter factors. See Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). In particular, Edmonds did not demonstrate that he was likely to succeed on the merits against Nutanix, given Nutanix’s evidence that it did not merge with D21Q. An initial case management conference is set for 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 2024, on Zoom. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2025 = VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge