Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener

Missouri Court of Appeals

Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener

449 S.W.3d 792, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2014 WL 6679291

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2014·No. WD 76867·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edmonds Dental Company (“EDC”) appeals a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Elbert Keener was not disqualified for unemployment benefits, because EDC had failed to prove that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Edmonds Dental Company (“EDC”) appeals a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Elbert Keener was not disqualified for unemployment benefits, because EDC had failed to prove that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener, 449 S.W.3d 792, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2014 WL 6679291 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 792 (Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.