Edmond v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Edmond v. State

416 S.W.3d 344, 2013 WL 6664973, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. ED 100129·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tony Edmond (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an eviden-tiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tony Edmond (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an eviden-tiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Edmond v. State, 416 S.W.3d 344, 2013 WL 6664973, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

416 S.W.3d 344 (Edmond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.