Edmond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edmond v. State

208 So. 2d 135, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5723

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1968

DocketNo. 1350

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 So. 2d 135 (Edmond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmond v. State, 208 So. 2d 135, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

After a defendant has been stopped for the violation of a traffic regulation at 4 A.M. and does not have a driver’s permit, and he tells the officer that the car is borrowed from a friend in Miami (over sixty miles away), but only gives his friend’s name as “Harry” and the officer observes a crowbar and screwdriver protruding from under the front seat and a radio with store tag on the back seat with the aid of a flashlight shined through the glass windows of the car, he has sufficient probable cause to make a thorough search of the automobile after arrest for the traffic violation and failure to produce a driver’s permit. Affirmed on authority of Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 596.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

After a defendant has been stopped for the violation of a traffic regulation at 4 A.M. and does not have a driver’s permit, and he tells the officer that the car is borrowed from a friend in Miami (over sixty miles away), but only gives his friend’s name as “Harry” and the officer observes a crowbar and screwdriver protruding from under the front seat and a radio with store tag on the back seat with the aid of a flashlight shined through the glass windows of the car, he has sufficient probable cause to make a thorough search of the automobile after arrest for the traffic violation and failure to produce a driver’s permit. Affirmed on authority of Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 596.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 So. 2d 135, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmond-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack