Edmond v. State

208 So. 2d 135, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5723
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1968·No. No. 1350·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

After a defendant has been stopped for the violation of a traffic regulation at 4 A.M. and does not have a driver’s permit, and he tells the officer that the car is borrowed from a friend in Miami (over sixty miles away), but only gives his friend’s name as “Harry” and the officer observes a crowbar and screwdriver protruding from under the front seat and a radio with store tag on the back seat with the aid of a flashlight shined through the glass windows of the car, he has sufficient probable cause to make a thorough search of the automobile after arrest for the traffic violation and failure to produce a driver’s permit. Affirmed on authority of Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 596.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edmond v. State, 208 So. 2d 135, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

208 So. 2d 135 (Edmond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Miller
267 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)