Edmond v. Nigh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1151

JOHN EDMOND; PAMELA LYLES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JUDY NIGH; SNOWDEN CHASE REALTY; EDWARD J. MAHER; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS 1 and 2; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02750-DKC)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edmond, Pamela Lyles, Appellants Pro Se. Juliane Corroon Miller, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; William Leonard Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Washington, D.C.; Rajeshanand Kumar, PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Cynthia G. Peltzman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Edmond and Pamela Lyles appeal the district court’s

order dismissing their civil action arising out of their eviction

from an apartment in Laurel, Maryland. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Edmond v. Nigh, No. 8:05-cv-

02750-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -