EDMOND SANTIAGO vs SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY
This text of EDMOND SANTIAGO vs SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY (EDMOND SANTIAGO vs SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EDMOND SANTIAGO,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-2370 LT Case No. 2020-DR-11282
SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 2, 2023
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Nancy Maloney, Judge.
Quoc Van, Sanford, for Appellant.
Heather C. Harris, of The H. Harris Law Firm, Merritt Island, for Appellee.
LAMBERT, C.J.
The final judgment dismissing Appellant’s petition to determine
paternity is affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Rev. v. Cummings, 930 So. 2d 604,
605 (Fla. 2006) (holding that the legal father is an indispensable party in an action to determine paternity unless it has been conclusively established that
the legal father’s rights to the child have been divested by some earlier
judgment). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant bringing an
action for paternity that includes the legal father of the subject minor child as
a party.
We next address Appellee’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees and
costs incurred in this appeal. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b)
provides, in pertinent part, that “a motion for attorneys’ fees shall state the
grounds on which recovery is sought.” A motion filed under this rule must
identify the particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis for an
award of attorney’s fees on appeal. See United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Phillips,
775 So. 2d 921, 922 (Fla. 2000) (interpreting rule 9.400(b) to require that a
party’s motion seeking appellate attorney’s fees “provide substance and
specify the particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis for an
award of fees on appeal”).
The sole basis identified in Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees is
section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2022). This statute authorizes an award of
appellate attorney’s fees in the context of dissolution of marriage
proceedings, not in paternity proceedings. The statutory basis for an award
of attorney’s fees in a paternity proceeding is section 742.045, Florida
2 Statutes, which has not been pled. Accordingly, Appellee’s motion for
appellate attorney’s fees is denied.
Lastly, we strike that part of Appellee’s motion seeking an award of
appellate costs, without prejudice to Appellee timely filing the motion in the
circuit court following the issuance of our mandate. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.400(a) (“[Appellate c]osts shall be taxed by the lower tribunal on a motion
served no later than 45 days after rendition of the [appellate] court’s order.”);
In re Guardianship of Bloom, 251 So. 3d 1026, 1029 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
(“Generally, if a party to an appeal files a motion in this court for an award of
costs on appeal, this court will strike the motion because such costs are
properly sought in the first instance in the trial court.” (footnote omitted));
Garcia v. Collazo, 178 So. 3d 429, 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (striking a motion
for costs on appeal without prejudice to the moving party filing a timely
motion under rule 9.400(a) in the circuit court).
AFFIRMED; APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY’S
FEES DENIED; APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR APPELLATE COSTS
STRICKEN, without prejudice.
MAKAR and JAY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EDMOND SANTIAGO vs SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmond-santiago-vs-shaynna-leanne-posey-fladistctapp-2023.