Edmond Machie v. Nancy Demme

564 F. App'x 17
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2014
Docket13-2539
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 564 F. App'x 17 (Edmond Machie v. Nancy Demme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmond Machie v. Nancy Demme, 564 F. App'x 17 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights complaint in part, granting summary judgment in favor of some defendants, denying his motion to alter or amend the grant of *18 summary judgment, and entering judgment in favor of the remaining defendant following a jury trial. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Machie’s informal brief does not fairly challenge the basis for the district court’s dispositions or the jury’s verdict, Machie has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Machie’s motions for counsel and for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boeh v. Dail
D. Maryland, 2025
Young v. Lacy
S.D. West Virginia, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. App'x 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmond-machie-v-nancy-demme-ca4-2014.