Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company v. Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company// Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland
This text of Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company v. Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company// Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland (Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company v. Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company// Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 2, 2013
NO. 03-11-00228-CV
Appellants, Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Cross-Appellant, Financial Indemnity Company, or properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company f/k/a Charter County Mutual Insurance Company
v.
Appellee, Financial Indemnity Company, or properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company f/k/a Charter County Mutual Insurance Company// Cross-Appellees, Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland
APPEAL FROM 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND HENSON REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR JUSTICE HENSON NOT PARTICIPATING
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s
judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the
trial court is reversed, and judgment is rendered in favor of the appellee/cross-appellant in
accordance with the jury’s verdict. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants/cross-appellees
pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision
be certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company v. Financial Indemnity Company, or Properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company F/K/A Charter County Mutual Insurance Company// Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmond-l-bisland-iii-and-rhonda-t-bisland-financial-indemnity-company-texapp-2013.