Edmiston v. Edmiston

10 Ky. Op. 317, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 197
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 26, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ky. Op. 317 (Edmiston v. Edmiston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmiston v. Edmiston, 10 Ky. Op. 317, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 197 (Ky. Ct. App. 1879).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The statute expressly provides that “no will or codicil shall be revoked” except in some one of the modes therein enumerated. No mere intention, however expressed, unless carried into execution by some of the acts designated in the statute, can have the effect, to revoke a will. The statute is plain and peremptory, is founded in wisdom, and has the sanction of experience. The legislature did not mean to have the devolution of estates to be controlled by parol evidence.

We have recently decided that the evidence of the declarations of a deceased person cannot be received to establish a will (Mercer’s Adm’r v. Mackin, 14 Bush 434), and the same reasons require us to hold that a will once duly executed cannot be revoked except in one of the modes provided by the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mercer's Adm'r v. Mackin
77 Ky. 434 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ky. Op. 317, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmiston-v-edmiston-kyctapp-1879.