Edmisten v. Edmisten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Edmisten v. Edmisten

144 S.E.2d 404, 265 N.C. 488, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1020

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 20, 1965

Docket366

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 144 S.E.2d 404 (Edmisten v. Edmisten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmisten v. Edmisten, 144 S.E.2d 404, 265 N.C. 488, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1020 (N.C. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CuRiam.

From and after the execution of a valid deed of separation, a husband and wife living apart do so by mutual consent. The prior misconduct of one will not defeat his action for divorce under G.S. 50-6, brought two years thereafter. Plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s further answer was properly sustained. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Jones v. Jones, 261 N.C. 612, 135 S.E. 2d 554; Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705, 127 S.E. 2d 525.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CuRiam.

From and after the execution of a valid deed of separation, a husband and wife living apart do so by mutual consent. The prior misconduct of one will not defeat his action for divorce under G.S. 50-6, brought two years thereafter. Plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s further answer was properly sustained. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Jones v. Jones, 261 N.C. 612, 135 S.E. 2d 554; Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705, 127 S.E. 2d 525.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E.2d 404, 265 N.C. 488, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmisten-v-edmisten-nc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack