Edmisten v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Edmisten v. Director of Revenue

345 S.W.3d 897, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086, 2011 WL 3667477

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2011

DocketWD 73045

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.W.3d 897 (Edmisten v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmisten v. Director of Revenue, 345 S.W.3d 897, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086, 2011 WL 3667477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Donald Edmisten appeals the ruling of the trial court upholding the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke his driver’s license. Edmisten’s license was revoked for refusing a breathalyzer test after he was stopped and arrested for driving while intoxicated. Because we determine that the Director showed that the officer had probable cause to believe Edmisten was driving while intoxicated, we affirm the ruling of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Donald Edmisten appeals the ruling of the trial court upholding the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke his driver’s license. Edmisten’s license was revoked for refusing a breathalyzer test after he was stopped and arrested for driving while intoxicated. Because we determine that the Director showed that the officer had probable cause to believe Edmisten was driving while intoxicated, we affirm the ruling of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 S.W.3d 897, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086, 2011 WL 3667477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmisten-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack