Edlitz v. Mummert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Edlitz v. Mummert

29 A.D.2d 756, 289 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4529

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 29, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 756 (Edlitz v. Mummert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edlitz v. Mummert, 29 A.D.2d 756, 289 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, entered July 29, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements to either party, and the matter is remanded to the Family Court for a hearing. In view of the allegation of changed circumstances, in the proper exercise of discretion, a hearing should have been had. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, entered July 29, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements to either party, and the matter is remanded to the Family Court for a hearing. In view of the allegation of changed circumstances, in the proper exercise of discretion, a hearing should have been had. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 756, 289 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edlitz-v-mummert-nyappdiv-1968.