Edlin v. Glinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Edlin v. Glinsky

129 A.D.2d 554, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 554 (Edlin v. Glinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edlin v. Glinsky, 129 A.D.2d 554, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff Tail-man Fire Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Ferraro, J.), dated January 13, 1986, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate their default in complying with discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs have come forward with a sufficient excuse and a reasonable showing of merit warranting a vacatur of their default (see, CPLR 2005; Battaglia v Hofmeister, 100 AD2d 833). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff Tail-man Fire Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Ferraro, J.), dated January 13, 1986, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate their default in complying with discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs have come forward with a sufficient excuse and a reasonable showing of merit warranting a vacatur of their default (see, CPLR 2005; Battaglia v Hofmeister, 100 AD2d 833). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 554, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edlin-v-glinsky-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack