Edlin Construction Co. v. Groh
This text of 522 So. 2d 1001 (Edlin Construction Co. v. Groh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against Edlin Construction Company. Genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the construction defects could have been avoided had the qualifying agent exercised due care in supervising construction, and whether the alleged negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. Thus, the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against Edlin Construction Company. See Gatwood v. McGee, 475 So.2d 720, 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
522 So. 2d 1001, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1190, 1988 WL 25449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edlin-construction-co-v-groh-fladistctapp-1988.