Edlin Construction Co. v. Groh
522 So. 2d 1001, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1190, 1988 WL 25449
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against Edlin Construction Company. Genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the construction defects could have been avoided had the qualifying agent exercised due care in supervising construction, and whether the alleged negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. Thus, the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against Edlin Construction Company. See Gatwood v. McGee, 475 So.2d 720, 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edlin Construction Co. v. Groh, 522 So. 2d 1001, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1190, 1988 WL 25449 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
522 So. 2d 1001 (Edlin Construction Co. v. Groh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gatwood v. McGee
475 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)