Edith Roman and Alejandro Hernandez v. Joy Halverson
This text of Edith Roman and Alejandro Hernandez v. Joy Halverson (Edith Roman and Alejandro Hernandez v. Joy Halverson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
EDITH ROMAN AND ALEJANDRO § HERNANDEZ, No. 08-17-00241-CV § Appellants, Appeal from the § v. 205th District Court § JOY HALVERSON, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellee. (TC# 20160DCV1580) §
ORDER
The above-styled and numbered appeal involves an issue related to the requirements of
notice for a dismissal hearing. In the order of dismissal, the trial court notes that due notice was
given and the cause was called on the date given in the notice, August 23, 2017. Although there
is a copy of an “Order Setting Hearing” in Appellee’s brief that shows the proper notice, there is
no corresponding copy in the clerk’s record. The Court, on its own motion, orders the clerk of the
trial court to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing any notice or order setting a hearing for
August 23, 2017 or certify in writing that there is no affidavit in the trial court’s file. The
supplemental clerk’s record should be filed as soon as practicable but no later than ten days from
the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2019.
PER CURIAM
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edith Roman and Alejandro Hernandez v. Joy Halverson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edith-roman-and-alejandro-hernandez-v-joy-halverson-texapp-2019.