Edith A. Mills v. Pearl M. Mealey, Mary Lee Rinehart, a Co-Partnership, T/a R & M Trucking Co., Gate City Transport Company, and Cleveland Ray Worley

393 F.2d 934, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7085
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 1968·No. 11896·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal in an automobile accident case, the appellant tenders princi *935 pally factual issues foreclosed by the verdict of the jury. That those issues were appropriate for the jury’s resolution and that they were submitted under full and proper instructions clearly appears from the opinion of the District Court on the motion for a new trial. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Mills v. Mealey, W.D.Va., 274 F.Supp. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edith A. Mills v. Pearl M. Mealey, Mary Lee Rinehart, a Co-Partnership, T/a R & M Trucking Co., Gate City Transport Company, and Cleveland Ray Worley, 393 F.2d 934, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7085 (4th Cir. 1968).

393 F.2d 934 (Edith A. Mills v. Pearl M. Mealey, Mary Lee Rinehart, a Co-Partnership, T/a R & M Trucking Co., Gate City Transport Company, and Cleveland Ray Worley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mills v. Mealey
274 F. Supp. 4 (W.D. Virginia, 1967)