Edith A. Mills v. Pearl M. Mealey, Mary Lee Rinehart, a Co-Partnership, T/a R & M Trucking Co., Gate City Transport Company, and Cleveland Ray Worley
This text of 393 F.2d 934 (Edith A. Mills v. Pearl M. Mealey, Mary Lee Rinehart, a Co-Partnership, T/a R & M Trucking Co., Gate City Transport Company, and Cleveland Ray Worley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal in an automobile accident case, the appellant tenders princi *935 pally factual issues foreclosed by the verdict of the jury. That those issues were appropriate for the jury’s resolution and that they were submitted under full and proper instructions clearly appears from the opinion of the District Court on the motion for a new trial. 1
Affirmed.
. Mills v. Mealey, W.D.Va., 274 F.Supp. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 F.2d 934, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edith-a-mills-v-pearl-m-mealey-mary-lee-rinehart-a-co-partnership-ta-ca4-1968.