Edison v. Perlbinder

271 A.D.2d 794

This text of 271 A.D.2d 794 (Edison v. Perlbinder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison v. Perlbinder, 271 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from an order-denying their motion to resettle a proposed case,on appeal by striking therefrom the record of a separate and distinct proceeding in contempt that grew out of the trial of the action. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. The record of a separate and distinct proceeding is not a proper part of the record on appeal from a judgment. (Wierichs v. Innis, 32 Mise. 462, affd. 56 App. Div. 625; 6 Carmody on Hew York Pleading and Practice, § 243.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Lewis, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-v-perlbinder-nyappdiv-1946.