Edison v. Judicial Department

898 P.2d 768, 321 Or. 415, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 103
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 3, 1995
DocketWCB 90-12890; CA A79872; SC S41599
StatusPublished

This text of 898 P.2d 768 (Edison v. Judicial Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison v. Judicial Department, 898 P.2d 768, 321 Or. 415, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 103 (Or. 1995).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Fadeley and Durham, JJ., would not dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 P.2d 768, 321 Or. 415, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-v-judicial-department-or-1995.