Edison United Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard
This text of 9 N.Y.S. 433 (Edison United Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection taken to the order for defendant’s examination was that the proposed examination might call for testimony that could be used to subject the defendant to a statutory penalty. The order confined" the examination by such limits that it cannot now be said that the apprehended result must happen. In this case it is best that any question as to a privilege by defendant against inculpating himself be determined upon the examination, when his rights will be completely protected. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 N.Y.S. 433, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-united-manufacturing-co-v-hazard-superctny-1890.