Edison Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard
This text of 26 Jones & S. 566 (Edison Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection taken to the order for defendant’s examination, was that the proposed examination might call for testimony that could be used to subject the defendant to a statutory penalty. The order confined the examination by such limits that it cannot now be said that the apprehended result must happen.
■ In this case, it is best that any question as to a privilege by defendant against inculpating himself be determined upon the examination, when his rights will be completely protected.
Order affirmed with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Jones & S. 566, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-manufacturing-co-v-hazard-nysuperctnyc-1890.