Edison Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard

26 Jones & S. 566, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 809
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedApril 9, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Jones & S. 566 (Edison Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison Manufacturing Co. v. Hazard, 26 Jones & S. 566, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 809 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The objection taken to the order for defendant’s examination, was that the proposed examination might call for testimony that could be used to subject the defendant to a statutory penalty. The order confined the examination by such limits that it cannot now be said that the apprehended result must happen.

■ In this case, it is best that any question as to a privilege by defendant against inculpating himself be determined upon the examination, when his rights will be completely protected.

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Jones & S. 566, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-manufacturing-co-v-hazard-nysuperctnyc-1890.