Edison Fixture Co. v. Schwartz

127 A. 557, 3 N.J. Misc. 185, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 325
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 5, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 557 (Edison Fixture Co. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison Fixture Co. v. Schwartz, 127 A. 557, 3 N.J. Misc. 185, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 325 (N.J. 1925).

Opinion

Pee Cuetam.

Our examination of the record in this case discloses no error justifying a reversal.

We think there was evidence in this case wherefrom payment of the claim in question might lawfully be inferred by the trial judge, as, apparently, it was inferred, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 557, 3 N.J. Misc. 185, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-fixture-co-v-schwartz-nj-1925.