Edison Fixture Co. v. Pasolo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Edison Fixture Co. v. Pasolo

129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 552, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 175

DecidedMay 19, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A. 924 (Edison Fixture Co. v. Pasolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edison Fixture Co. v. Pasolo, 129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 552, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 175 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $44.40 on a written “contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded, for the reason stated in No. 452, the present- term, and the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $44.40 on a written “contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded, for the reason stated in No. 452, the present- term, and the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 552, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-fixture-co-v-pasolo-nj-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack