Edison Fixture Co. v. Lazar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Edison Fixture Co. v. Lazar

129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 551, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 174

DecidedMay 19, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A. 924 (Edison Fixture Co. v. Lazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edison Fixture Co. v. Lazar, 129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 551, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $14.80 on a written contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

[552]*552The case is controlled by the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551. In that case, it was said we are unable to find any evidence justifying the judgment. So, in the present case.

The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $14.80 on a written contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

[552]*552The case is controlled by the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551. In that case, it was said we are unable to find any evidence justifying the judgment. So, in the present case.

The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A. 924, 3 N.J. Misc. 551, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-fixture-co-v-lazar-nj-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack