Edison Fixture Co. v. Goldberg

127 A. 556, 3 N.J. Misc. 194, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 338
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 5, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 556 (Edison Fixture Co. v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison Fixture Co. v. Goldberg, 127 A. 556, 3 N.J. Misc. 194, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 338 (N.J. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record discloses no error justifying reversal. This case was argued with Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, No. 475, of the present term, but it differs from that in a material matter. Here, the evidence permitted of the inference by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, that the-plaintiff deceived the defendant as to the fact that he was signing a contract, by the false representation that he was signing, as a matter of form, a paper having no obligatory force.

This testimony furnishes a basis for the jndment in favor of the defendant, which will be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 556, 3 N.J. Misc. 194, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-fixture-co-v-goldberg-nj-1925.