Edison Fixture Co. v. Gleason

128 A. 789, 3 N.J. Misc. 478, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 6, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 128 A. 789 (Edison Fixture Co. v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edison Fixture Co. v. Gleason, 128 A. 789, 3 N.J. Misc. 478, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1925).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

As we understand the ora] statement of counsel (no papers were laid before us) there were included in respondents’ costs in this court an argument fee, although no argument was had or brief filed, and a fee for preparation of issue, though no issue was prepared. In fact, respondents did nothing in the appeal and were content to have it determined on the presentation of the cases by the appellant. We are unable to see why such fees should be taxed when the services to which they are applicable were not performed, and they should be struck from the bills of costs.

Let rule be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A. 789, 3 N.J. Misc. 478, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-fixture-co-v-gleason-nj-1925.