Edifika Investments, LLC D/B/A Military Village Apartments v. Chain & Chain Construction, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 9, 2022
Docket04-21-00568-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Edifika Investments, LLC D/B/A Military Village Apartments v. Chain & Chain Construction, LLC (Edifika Investments, LLC D/B/A Military Village Apartments v. Chain & Chain Construction, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edifika Investments, LLC D/B/A Military Village Apartments v. Chain & Chain Construction, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00568-CV

EDIFIKA INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a Military Village Apartments, Appellant

v.

CHAIN & CHAIN CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-CI-14175 Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 9, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On December 20, 2021, appellant Edifika Investments, LLC d/b/a Military Village

Apartments filed a notice of appeal, stating its intent to appeal the trial court’s judgment entered

on September 21, 2021. The clerk’s record was due January 19, 2022, but it was not filed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(c). On January 25, 2022, the district clerk filed a notification stating the

clerk’s record would not be filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay the

clerk’s fee to prepare the record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On January

26, 2022, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before February 7, 2022 04-21-00568-CV

showing either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s

fee; or (2) he is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We cautioned appellant if it failed

to respond within the time provided, its appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c). Appellant has not filed a response.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order

appellee Chain & Chain Construction, LLC recover its costs in this appeal, if any, from appellant

Edifika Investments, LLC d/b/a/ Military Village Apartments.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edifika Investments, LLC D/B/A Military Village Apartments v. Chain & Chain Construction, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edifika-investments-llc-dba-military-village-apartments-v-chain-chain-texapp-2022.