Edie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edie v. State

750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2000 WL 227968

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-2564

StatusPublished

This text of 750 So. 2d 782 (Edie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edie v. State, 750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2000 WL 227968 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for entry of a written sentencing order that is consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 731 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Tannehill v. State, 712 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Specifically, the transcripts show that the trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent sentences of 86 months for Count 1 and Count 2 in Circuit Court Case No. 94-31780, to be served consecutively to the sentence received in the defendant’s probation revocation in Circuit Court Case No. 93-48317. As a result of the State’s confession of error, the remaining issues raised by the defendant are rendered moot.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for entry of a written sentencing order that is consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 731 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Tannehill v. State, 712 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Specifically, the transcripts show that the trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent sentences of 86 months for Count 1 and Count 2 in Circuit Court Case No. 94-31780, to be served consecutively to the sentence received in the defendant’s probation revocation in Circuit Court Case No. 93-48317. As a result of the State’s confession of error, the remaining issues raised by the defendant are rendered moot.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2000 WL 227968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edie-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack