Edie v. State

750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2000 WL 227968
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2000·No. No. 3D98-2564·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for entry of a written sentencing order that is consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 731 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Tannehill v. State, 712 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Specifically, the transcripts show that the trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent sentences of 86 months for Count 1 and Count 2 in Circuit Court Case No. 94-31780, to be served consecutively to the sentence received in the defendant’s probation revocation in Circuit Court Case No. 93-48317. As a result of the State’s confession of error, the remaining issues raised by the defendant are rendered moot.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edie v. State, 750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2000 WL 227968 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

750 So. 2d 782 (Edie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tannehill v. State
712 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Turner v. State
731 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)