Edic, Kevin Vance

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided August 24, 2011·No. PD-0623-11·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0623-11
KEVIN VANCE EDIC, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

Meyers, J., filed a dissenting statement.

DISSENTING STATEMENT



I would grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review and affirm the court of appeals. While I agree with the decision of the court of appeals, I do not feel that the issue raised by Appellant was fully addressed in the opinion. We have determined that a threat under the retaliation statute can be communicated to the person being threatened through a third party, however, we have never considered whether the complainant must have knowledge of the threat. Because this is an issue we should deliberate, I respectfully dissent to the Court's decision to refuse Appellant's petition for discretionary review.



Meyers, J.



Filed: August 24, 2011

Publish



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edic, Kevin Vance, (Tex. 2011).

Edic, Kevin Vance (Edic, Kevin Vance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.