Edic, Kevin Vance
Opinion
I would grant Appellant's petition for discretionary review and affirm the court of appeals. While I agree with the decision of the court of appeals, I do not feel that the issue raised by Appellant was fully addressed in the opinion. We have determined that a threat under the retaliation statute can be communicated to the person being threatened through a third party, however, we have never considered whether the complainant must have knowledge of the threat. Because this is an issue we should deliberate, I respectfully dissent to the Court's decision to refuse Appellant's petition for discretionary review.
Meyers, J.
Filed: August 24, 2011
Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edic, Kevin Vance (Edic, Kevin Vance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.