Edgington v. Ari Mutual Insurance

728 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3107, 1999 WL 140583
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1371
StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 351 (Edgington v. Ari Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edgington v. Ari Mutual Insurance, 728 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3107, 1999 WL 140583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the dismissal of plaintiffs complaint for failure to serve defendant within the 120-day period required under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(i). The record reflects that plaintiff demonstrated “good cause” for failure to serve defendant. See Hernandez v. Page, 580 So.2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). In this case, as in Carlton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 621 So.2d 451, 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), plaintiff was “justified in believing that [defendant] had acquiesced in the proposal that [defendant] not be served until ‘all reasonable settlement opportunities ha[d] been explored.’ ”

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
621 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hernandez v. Page
580 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3107, 1999 WL 140583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgington-v-ari-mutual-insurance-fladistctapp-1999.