Edgeworth v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Edgeworth v. Hicks

168 So. 869, 232 Ala. 468, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 294

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 4, 1936

Docket8 Div. 714.

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 869 (Edgeworth v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edgeworth v. Hicks, 168 So. 869, 232 Ala. 468, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 294 (Ala. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

It is questionable if the appellant’s brief sufficiently complies with Supreme Cpurt Rule 10 so as to warrant the consideration of this appeál. We find, however, that there was no objection or exceptions to the rulings referred to in the assignments of error, save the general conclusion or judgment of the court who tried the case without a jury. As to this sole exception, there is no argument in appellant’s brief pointing out why the conclusion or judgment was erroneous.

The judgment of the circuit court is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

It is questionable if the appellant’s brief sufficiently complies with Supreme Cpurt Rule 10 so as to warrant the consideration of this appeál. We find, however, that there was no objection or exceptions to the rulings referred to in the assignments of error, save the general conclusion or judgment of the court who tried the case without a jury. As to this sole exception, there is no argument in appellant’s brief pointing out why the conclusion or judgment was erroneous.

The judgment of the circuit court is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 869, 232 Ala. 468, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgeworth-v-hicks-ala-1936.