Edgett v. Romans
This text of 282 A.D. 729 (Edgett v. Romans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by plaintiffs from so much of an order denying their motion to examine before trial the board of education of the school district. The motion was denied at Special Term on the ground that the school district was not a party defendant. Order affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to renewal of the application at a later date, if plaintiffs be so advised. Assuming, without so deciding, that the board of education of the school district is a party, no issue has as yet been joined by the board and in any event no motion was made to examine the board as a defendant. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 729, 122 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgett-v-romans-nyappdiv-1953.