Edgett v. Jennings
This text of 202 A.D. 731 (Edgett v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint is on an express contract, and not to recover for services on a quantum, meruit. The amount paid by the defendant for the Cowles Camp purchased by defendant is, therefore, irrelevant "to the issue. In so far as the order directs an examination of the defendant as to this amount paid, it must be reversed. The other two subjects of examination were proper. (Richards v. Whiting, 127 App. Div. 208.) Order modified by striking out the subject of examination designated in said order by paragraph 3, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Blackmar, P. J„ Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgett-v-jennings-nyappdiv-1922.