Edgerton v. Whiten

162 S.E. 678, 174 Ga. 189, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 20
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1931·No. No. 8610·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

Under the facts appearing in the record and under the law applicable thereto, the judge did not err in granting a temporary injunction and appointing a temporary receiver.

Judgment affirmed-

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., who dissents. J. P. Highsmith and Jap. H. Highsmith, for plaintiff in error. M. E. Wood and H. J. Lawrence, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgerton v. Whiten, 162 S.E. 678, 174 Ga. 189, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Ga. 1931).

162 S.E. 678 (Edgerton v. Whiten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.