Edgerton v. Thompson

956 P.2d 1068, 153 Or. App. 367, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 410
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 1, 1998·No. 95C13882; CA A97717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendants concede that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of proof in granting their motion for summary judgment. They also concede that, under the correct standard, material issues of fact may exist. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for farther proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgerton v. Thompson, 956 P.2d 1068, 153 Or. App. 367, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 410 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

956 P.2d 1068 (Edgerton v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.