Edgerton v. Lynch

Michigan Supreme Court

Edgerton v. Lynch

233 N.W. 377, 252 Mich. 451, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 858

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 1930

DocketDocket No. 53, Calendar No. 35,161.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 N.W. 377 (Edgerton v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edgerton v. Lynch, 233 N.W. 377, 252 Mich. 451, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 858 (Mich. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

McDonald, J.

On the 28th of August, 1929, Robert Louis Edgerton, three years and four months of age, was instantly killed when struck by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. His mother, Jennie Edgerton, as administratrix of his estate, brought this suit under the death act (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14577 et seq.) to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by herself and her husband. She received a verdict of $1,000. The court refused plaintiff’s motion to set it aside on the ground that it was inadequate, and entered judgment on the verdict. The plaintiff has brought error.

During the impaneling of the jury, a question arose as to the number of peremptory challenges which the plaintiff was entitled to exercise. She had exercised four and claimed the right to a fifth. The court overruled the last challenge, holding that, with the exercise of four, her right to peremptory challenge was exhausted. In so ruling the court erred. By statute, Act No. 342, Pub. Acts 1921 (amending 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12612), each party in all civil cases is allowed five peremptory challenges. The right of peremptory challenge as restricted by statute is a substantial right of which a party cannot be deprived without prejudice.

It is not necessary to discuss the inadequacy of the verdict.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff.

Wiest, C. J., and Btttzel, Clark, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fbad, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald, J.

On the 28th of August, 1929, Robert Louis Edgerton, three years and four months of age, was instantly killed when struck by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. His mother, Jennie Edgerton, as administratrix of his estate, brought this suit under the death act (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14577 et seq.) to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by herself and her husband. She received a verdict of $1,000. The court refused plaintiff’s motion to set it aside on the ground that it was inadequate, and entered judgment on the verdict. The plaintiff has brought error.

During the impaneling of the jury, a question arose as to the number of peremptory challenges which the plaintiff was entitled to exercise. She had exercised four and claimed the right to a fifth. The court overruled the last challenge, holding that, with the exercise of four, her right to peremptory challenge was exhausted. In so ruling the court erred. By statute, Act No. 342, Pub. Acts 1921 (amending 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12612), each party in all civil cases is allowed five peremptory challenges. The right of peremptory challenge as restricted by statute is a substantial right of which a party cannot be deprived without prejudice.

It is not necessary to discuss the inadequacy of the verdict.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff.

Wiest, C. J., and Btttzel, Clark, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fbad, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 N.W. 377, 252 Mich. 451, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgerton-v-lynch-mich-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack