Edgerton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Edgerton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

139 S.E. 439, 194 N.C. 791, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 220

DecidedSeptember 28, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 439 (Edgerton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edgerton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 139 S.E. 439, 194 N.C. 791, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 220 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court below charged the jury clearly and accurately the law of actionable negligence applicable to the facts in the case.

From a careful reading of the record we can find no prejudicial or reversible error.

The action is similar and tried in accordance to the law as set forth in Farming Co. v. R. R., 189 N. C., 63. The same principle is set forth in C. & O. R. R. Co. v. Thompson Mfg. Co., 270 U. S., 416, 70 L. Ed., 659.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI