Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco. Read the opinion of the Court — 599 F.3d 946
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2008·No. 05-15080·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERRIS EDGERLY,  Plaintiff-Appellant, Nos. 05-15080 v. 05-15382 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN  D.C. No. FRANCISCO; DAVID GOFF; JOHN CV-03-02169-WHA CONEFREY; FREDERICK SCHIFF, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.  Filed May 22, 2008

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., John T. Noonan, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The peti- tion for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The opinion filed on July 17, 2007 and reported at 495 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 2007) is WITHDRAWN. The panel will file a new disposition in due course.

5925 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco, (9th Cir. 2008).

Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco (Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgerly v. City and County of San Francisco
495 F.3d 645 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)