Edgell v. Coates

Superior Court of Delaware

Edgell v. Coates

8 Del. 325

DecidedJuly 5, 1866

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Del. 325 (Edgell v. Coates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edgell v. Coates, 8 Del. 325 (Del. Ct. App. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court, Gilpin, C. J., charged the jury,

that the plaintiff Coates, must prove to their satisfaction that the due bill was made and delivered by the deceased to him, and, as the statute of limitations had been pleaded, that the suit below had been commenced within six years thereafter, or he could not recover, since no other demand for the payment of it, had been proved, than the institution of the suit, which was equivalent to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court, Gilpin, C. J., charged the jury,

that the plaintiff Coates, must prove to their satisfaction that the due bill was made and delivered by the deceased to him, and, as the statute of limitations had been pleaded, that the suit below had been commenced within six years thereafter, or he could not recover, since no other demand for the payment of it, had been proved, than the institution of the suit, which was equivalent to it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Del. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgell-v-coates-delsuperct-1866.