Edge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edge v. State

846 So. 2d 1193, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7954, 2003 WL 21221674

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edge v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 876 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 2003·No. No. 4D02-3171·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand this case for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment [1194]*1194of portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief in relation to the claim that counsel affirmatively misled her of the maximum length of her sentence if she declined to accept any plea bargains and proceeded to trial. See Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963, 967 (Fla.1999). The attachment on which the state relies to refute this claim does not do so.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand this case for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment [1194]*1194of portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief in relation to the claim that counsel affirmatively misled her of the maximum length of her sentence if she declined to accept any plea bargains and proceeded to trial. See Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963, 967 (Fla.1999). The attachment on which the state relies to refute this claim does not do so.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Edge v. State, 846 So. 2d 1193, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7954, 2003 WL 21221674 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

846 So. 2d 1193 (Edge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related