Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Edge v. State

Edge v. State

846 So. 2d 1193, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7954, 2003 WL 21221674
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-3171
StatusPublished

This text of 846 So. 2d 1193 (Edge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edge v. State, 846 So. 2d 1193, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7954, 2003 WL 21221674 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand this case for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment [1194]*1194of portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief in relation to the claim that counsel affirmatively misled her of the maximum length of her sentence if she declined to accept any plea bargains and proceeded to trial. See Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963, 967 (Fla.1999). The attachment on which the state relies to refute this claim does not do so.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cottle v. State
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 166 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 So. 2d 1193, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7954, 2003 WL 21221674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edge-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.