Edge v. . Feldspar Corporation
198 S.E. 644, 214 N.C. 818, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 417
Opinion
The question involved: Did the court below commit error in sustaining the defendant's motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit at the close of plaintiffs' evidence?
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Schenck, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action without becoming a precedent. Ins. Co. v. Stinson ante, 97.
The judgment of the court below is
Affirmed. *Page 819
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edge v. . Feldspar Corporation, 198 S.E. 644, 214 N.C. 818, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 417 (N.C. 1938).
198 S.E. 644 (Edge v. . Feldspar Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.